Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Posted by: Michele Bachmann at 9:51 AM
It's a big news week in Washington, but perhaps no item is more significant than the cost analysis released by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) for the Democrats’ new health care reform bill.

Proposed by Senator Ted Kennedy's Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, the CBO found that it would cost at least $1 trillion over 10 years, and yet leave tens of millions of people uninsured. What’s even more troubling is that this hefty price tag does not include the massive costs of a government-run insurance plan or an expansion of Medicaid.

Politico reports that:

"The CBO concluded that by 2017, for example, the ranks of the uninsured would drop by about one third, or 16 million people, relative to projections under the current law.

"In that year, about 39 million would be covered by policies purchased through a government-organized marketplace known as an exchange. At the same time, however, 15 million would lose their employer provided insurance and another 8 million would move away from coverage they receive through government programs, the analysis concluded."


In sum, this plan spends too much, covers too few, and forces too many to lose the coverage that they have now. Clearly, it is anything but a fiscally responsible approach to health care reform. But we really shouldn't be surprised seeing how reckless the White House and Congress have been with your money over the past several months.

A government takeover of health care will raise taxes, ration care, and let government bureaucrats make decisions that should be made by families and their health care professionals. Republicans support health care reform that puts patients first and protects the important doctor-patient relationship. Republicans want to make quality health care affordable and accessible for every American and we want to let those who like their current health care coverage keep it.

We cannot allow politicians and special interests to stand between patients and the care they need. The American people deserve the freedom to choose the health care that is best for their families.


View in ascending order View in descending order
theone writes: Wednesday, June, 17, 2009 11:13 AM
bytchmann
is a physcotic maniac who needs a reality check and stop answering to the sourcers.
Don't Tread On Me writes: Wednesday, June, 17, 2009 11:20 AM
"theone": Another liberal maniac
without a clue, an education OR a dictionary..
Cuban Pete writes: Wednesday, June, 17, 2009 11:24 AM
We need freedom from the....
...coercive, Big Government mandated health care. First of all, what's the logic in having to spend umpteen trillions of dollars ($,$$$,$$$,$$$.$$!) TO LOWER THE COSTS?! If that isn't one of the ultimate government sponsored oxymorons, name a bigger one! Also, please, someone who wants their health care subsidized by coercing others' labor and paying for it by confiscating others' resources and money, what's your moral, ethical, logical, legal or constitutional reasoning for doing so?

Your lefty lib leadership just wants the power to dictate. And the lefty lib masses are just greedy,envious, lazy, egotists who want some perceived "payback" from people they hate because they think "those people" have more than the lefties have. They just want to sock it to "those people".
Michael writes: Wednesday, June, 17, 2009 11:28 AM
Status Quo is fine with Rep. Bachmann
Michele Bachmann said

"In sum, this plan spends too much, covers too few, and forces too many to lose the coverage that they have now.
"
Rep. Bachmann, you just described our current health care system

Some of Rep. Bachmann's biggest campaign contributors are insurance companies, pharmaceuticals and healthcare providers.

The Republican’s status quo health plan is payback to the insurance and healthcare industries
Michael writes: Wednesday, June, 17, 2009 11:31 AM
Bachmann Book Now Available
Michele Bachmann book is now in print and can be ordered

http://www.biasedliberalmedia.com
mattma writes: Wednesday, June, 17, 2009 12:09 PM
Give me a break.
Where is healthcare enumerated in the US Constitution? If it isn’t enumerated there, it is left up to the states; we can see how well that is working out in MA.

Michael writes: Wednesday, June, 17, 2009 12:35 PM
Unconstitutional
I guess you begrudge health care for our vets (VA) and our seniors (medicare)
Michael writes: Wednesday, June, 17, 2009 12:37 PM
Republican Gov
Give me a break.
Where is healthcare enumerated in the US Constitution? If it isn’t enumerated there, it is left up to the states; we can see how well that is working out in MA.

Do you mean Romney's plan

vladimir estragon writes: Wednesday, June, 17, 2009 12:47 PM
Just when you thought it was safe
...to visit the right-wing blogosphere, they go through the looking glass and over the cuckoo's nest one more time.

"Democrats Health Care Plan Costs Too Much, Covers Too Few, and Drops Too Many"

Now we have Michelle Bachmann complaining that Obama's health care plan doesn't cover enough people.

A pig just flew by my window.
The Plumber writes: Wednesday, June, 17, 2009 1:50 PM
Ms Bachmann
The Left doesn't care about cost or coverage. They care only about control. The "problems" that you mention are mere "opportunities" for the Left.

They are statists. Control over life and death is biggest, ripest plum of all.
The Plumber writes: Wednesday, June, 17, 2009 1:52 PM
Michael
"I guess you begrudge health care for our vets (VA) and our seniors (medicare)"

"no" to VA

"yes" to Medicare
Chuck writes: Thursday, June, 18, 2009 2:36 PM
Congresswoman Bachmann
So, aside from what your subject line accurately indicates is wrong with it, the Democrats plan seems okay, then?

Just checking -- and just kidding. I think I'm still "agin it."

Thanks for your comments. Keep up the good fight. There are those of us who have always listened but also, now, an increasing number who are finally waking up and starting to listen as well -- and 2010 cannot come soon enough.
Jerry writes: Saturday, June, 20, 2009 2:23 PM
Since govt healthcare is so bad....
Congresscritters get full SP/UHC paid by the govt. If that healthcare were so bad, then we would be seeing Michelle and her family (and other Congresscritters as well) suffering due to the lack of adequate medical care (because "the govt bureaucrats" would't allow them to get it because it would cost too much--and that would RAISE TAXES). So, it seems the Party of Michelle has set up a neat conundrum. Either they/she give(s) up FREE govt SP/UHC healthcare (because it is BAD or "micro-managed by govt bureaucrats") OR she acknowledges it works for most govt employees--and, if it works for that large group, then it should work for the rest of the US population.
Sign Up to Post Your Comments Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered, click here.
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
 

ABOUT THE BLOG
The importance of the blogosphere in shaping and motivating the current conservative movement is unquestionable not only has it served as an important tool in breaking through the liberal MSM clutter but it has helped to keep our elected officials true to princicple.
The Michele Bachmann blog is meant to further the online discussion in the marketplace of ideas.
 
 
funnies
Archives
Blog Search:



Blog Roll